The
Federal Reserve recently announced important policy changes after its
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting. Here are the three most
important takeaways, in its own words:
- The Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions – including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run – are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.
- The Committee judges that inflation at the rate of 2 percent, as measured by the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures, is most consistent over the longer run with the Federal Reserve's statutory mandate. In the most recent projections, FOMC participants' estimates of the longer-run normal rate of unemployment had a central tendency of 5.2 percent to 6.0 percent.
- The Fed released FOMC participants' target federal funds rate for the next few years.
Immediate Reactions
The
first item is the most important as it was not expected – and it had an
immediate effect on markets. As seen in the chart below, gold spiked
higher on the surprise news of extending the zero-rate policy through
2014.
The news prompted a similar jump in silver services:
Keeping
rates low requires the Fed to print new money to buy Treasuries, so the
dollar weakened against the euro, although the reaction wasn't as big
as in those in the gold and silver markets. This is partially due to the
fact that the ECB is on its own campaign of printing money.
The
promise to keep short-term rates low for a longer period also caused
longer-term rates to fall slightly, as seen in the 10-year Treasury rate
chart below, which fell from about 2.05% to 1.95 %, a relatively modest
decline.
What Does This Say about the Fed's Policy?
The
most important action of the three was to extend the zero Fed funds
rate to the end of 2014. This is a form of easing that could affect more
rates than just short-term rates. Furthermore, there is a debate as to
whether the action was the result of the Fed's concern about the economy
slipping back into recession. Or, this could also be a bullish sign for
the economy and stock market, as the guaranteed low rates could
increase investment to improve our economy. Zero rates drive investors
to take on risks – such as buying stocks – to gain higher returns. As a
result, this induces more investment toward riskier parts of the market,
which might otherwise be underfunded. Though the Fed aims to stimulate
the economy, we're more likely to see a slip back into recession rather
than see an effective Fed stimulus improving the economy.
The
press conference suggested that quantitative easing (QE) remains on the
table. As a result, new targeted asset purchases by the Fed are likely
in our future. These additional purchases with newly printed money could
become inflationary. That is why gold shot higher and the dollar
weakened in the short term.
Both
the Fed and the ECB have decidedly less-hawkish members and leadership
than just last year. Both have now moved toward more money printing to
keep rates low. The chart of central bank balance sheet as a ratio to
GDP shows that the central banks of the world are clearly "printing":
Longer-Term Implications
The
problem with printing money and promising to do so for years ahead of
time is that the negative consequences of inflation only happen after a
delay. As a result, it's difficult to know if a policy has gone too far
until years down the road at times. Unfortunately, if confidence in the
dollar is lost, the consequences cannot be easily reversed. One problem
for the Fed itself is that it holds long-term securities that will lose
value if rates rise. The federal government faces an even more serious
problem when interest rates rise, as higher rates on its debt mean
greater interest payments to service. Due to this federal-government
debt burden, the Fed has an incentive to keep rates low, even if the
long-term result is higher inflation. However, for now the Fed's
statement suggests it sees inflation as "subdued," so it's putting those
concerns aside for now.
Along
with the promise of low rates, the Fed for the first time gave an
inflation target of 2%, as measured by Personal Consumption
Expenditures. The actual and target inflation show that the Fed is
currently not under major pressure from missing its target… not yet.
The
Fed has not even tried to set a target for the unemployment rate, which
is only expected to edge below 8% by 2013. The Fed says that that the
longer-run unemployment range is 5% to 6%. The big difference from the
current level of 8.5% indicates that the Fed faces a greater challenge
with unemployment than inflation now.
My
conclusion from the Fed's actions is that it doesn't care as much about
its inflation target as it does about improving the unemployment rate.
Thus, it will err on the side of letting inflation rise, if it would
improve unemployment. But holding rates too low too long fueled the
housing bubble. Repeating the same game will have consequences of
malinvestment in the form of new bubbles in the economy. The Fed hopes
to restore employment before the negative consequences of loose monetary
policy show up.
The
Fed provided the accompanying chart of the Fed funds rates expected by
the seventeen members of the FOMC. Each dot indicates the value (rounded
to the nearest quarter-percent) of an individual participant's judgment
of the appropriate level of the target Federal funds rate at the end of
the specified calendar year. Over the long run, the Fed expects the
funds rate to rise to around 4.25%. Eleven of the members indicate that
the rate will rise before 2015. Only six expect the rate to stay close
to zero through 2014.
The
above chart should not be taken very seriously, as Fed predictions have
been notoriously inaccurate. Furthermore, it's likely that rates will
rise before 2014 as a result of market forces pushing them upward due to
mistrust of the currency – measured by rising gold and commodity
prices.
The
Federal Reserve balance sheet expanded dramatically as the credit
crisis became acute in 2008. The Policy Tools (shown below in black)
grew by $2 trillion with the QE1 purchase of mortgage-backed securities
and the QE2 purchase of long-term Treasuries. This was an unprecedented
effort to support those markets, provide liquidity, and drive rates down
to zero. A simple extrapolation of similar expansion policies to the
end of 2014 suggests that the Fed may require an additional $2 trillion
to extend its goals. The problem is that such action would surely weaken
the dollar and drive gold much higher. If confidence is lost, rates
could rise even as the Fed continues to print and buy securities. The
Fed says that it will change its policy if conditions warrant. I think
they will be forced to stop this policy well before 2014 is over.
Nonetheless, in the meantime, they will plant the seeds of rising prices
with ultralow rates.
The
gold price is driven by Fed policies and its bias toward printing money
rather than defending the dollar's purchasing power. This Fed bias was
again reconfirmed by this announcement. With all the Fed's renewed vigor
toward keeping rates low longer, we can once again reconfirm the
ongoing downward slide for the dollar. As a result, gold remains the
best investment against the damaging government deficits and central
bank policies around the world.
0 التعليقات
إرسال تعليق